1999 Mahindra Armada vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1999 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1999 Mahindra Armada.
Because 1999 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mahindra Armada | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mahindra | Holden |
| Model | Armada | Epica |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4805 mm |
