1999 Mahindra CL vs. 1982 Renault 9

To start off, 1999 Mahindra CL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mahindra CL (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mahindra CL should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mahindra CL weights approximately 315 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Mahindra CL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mahindra CL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (104 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1999 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9.

Compare all specifications: