1999 Mahindra CL vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mahindra CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mahindra CL would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mahindra CL (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mahindra CL should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Because 1999 Mahindra CL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mahindra CL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mahindra CL | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mahindra | Renault |
Model | CL | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2523 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2480 mm |