1999 Mazda 323 vs. 1968 Toyota 1000
To start off, 1999 Mazda 323 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota 1000 would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda 323 (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1968 Toyota 1000. (46 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 323 weights approximately 407 kg more than 1968 Toyota 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Toyota 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda 323 (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota 1000. (65 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda 323 | 1968 Toyota 1000 | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 323 | 1000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 46 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 65 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 61 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 36 L |