1999 Mazda 323 vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 2 (78 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1999 Mazda 323. (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 323 weights approximately 22 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 2 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda 323 | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 323 | 2 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |