1999 Mazda 323 vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 74 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 323 weights approximately 31 kg more than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda 323 (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda 323 | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 323 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 109 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |