1999 Mazda 323 vs. 2008 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1999 Mazda 323. (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 323 weights approximately 17 kg more than 2008 Nissan Rogue.
Because 2008 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda 323 | 2008 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 323 | Rogue |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |