1999 Mazda 626 vs. 1949 Riley RM A
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 626 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Because 1949 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda 626 | 1949 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | 626 | RM A |
Year Released | 1999 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2870 mm |