1999 Mazda 626 vs. 1958 Opel Record
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Opel Record. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Opel Record would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Opel Record is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Opel Record. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda 626 | 1958 Opel Record | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | 626 | Record |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 1 valves |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
