1999 Mazda 626 vs. 1968 Oldsmobile 442
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Oldsmobile 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Oldsmobile 442 would be higher. At 7,464 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Oldsmobile 442 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1999 Mazda 626.
Because 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Oldsmobile 442. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda 626 | 1968 Oldsmobile 442 | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 626 | 442 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 7464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2850 mm |