1999 Mazda 626 vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda 626 (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 626 weights approximately 518 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda 626 | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 626 | 9 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 38 L |
