1999 Mazda 626 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1999 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda 626 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda 626. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda 626 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 626 | 200 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1839 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |