1999 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1999 Mazda 626. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda 626 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 626 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1839 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |
