1999 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Holden Calais

To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1999 Mazda 626. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda 626.

Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda 626. (224 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda 626. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1999 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1999 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: