1999 Mazda Activehicle vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1999 Mazda Activehicle is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Activehicle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Activehicle weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (278 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda Activehicle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda Activehicle | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Activehicle | R 360 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 63 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |