1999 Mazda Activehicle vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1999 Mazda Activehicle is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Activehicle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda Activehicle | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | Activehicle | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4690 mm |
