1999 Mazda Activehicle vs. 1997 Rover 414i

To start off, 1999 Mazda Activehicle is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Activehicle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Activehicle weights approximately 110 kg more than 1997 Rover 414i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Mazda Activehicle is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Rover 414i. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (278 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda Activehicle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i. 1999 Mazda Activehicle has automatic transmission and 1997 Rover 414i has manual transmission. 1997 Rover 414i will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda Activehicle will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: