1999 Mazda Activehicle vs. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5
To start off, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda Activehicle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda Activehicle would be higher. At 2,981 cc, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 weights approximately 131 kg more than 1999 Mazda Activehicle.
Because 1999 Mazda Activehicle is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 (353 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Activehicle. (278 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Activehicle.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda Activehicle | 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Activehicle | FCHV 5 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2981 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1701 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 2720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
