1999 Mazda Activehicle vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda Activehicle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda Activehicle would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Activehicle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (215 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 1999 Mazda Activehicle is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Nissan Cube. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (278 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda Activehicle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda Activehicle | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Activehicle | Cube |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 82 L |