1999 Mazda Activehicle vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda Activehicle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda Activehicle would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Activehicle is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1999 Mazda Activehicle.
Because 1999 Mazda Activehicle is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Activehicle. (278 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Activehicle.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda Activehicle | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Activehicle | C70 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |