1999 Mazda AZ vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1999 Mazda AZ is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 180 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda AZ | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | AZ | Colt |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2390 mm |