1999 Mazda AZ vs. 1997 Volvo S90
To start off, 1999 Mazda AZ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Volvo S90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Volvo S90 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Volvo S90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Volvo S90 weights approximately 820 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 1997 Volvo S90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Volvo S90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda AZ | 1997 Volvo S90 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | AZ | S90 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1997 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |