1999 Mazda AZ vs. 2010 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2010 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 818 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 1999 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Transit Connect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Transit Connect has automatic transmission and 1999 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 1999 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Transit Connect will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda AZ | 2010 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | AZ | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 756 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2911 mm |