1999 Mazda AZ vs. 2012 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2012 Fiat Croma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Croma weights approximately 184 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 1999 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fiat Croma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda AZ | 2012 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | Mazda | Fiat |
| Model | AZ | Croma |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 756 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2710 mm |
