1999 Mazda AZ vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 800 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda AZ | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | AZ | Colt |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2500 mm |
