1999 Mazda AZ vs. 2012 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2012 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1303 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 2012 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mazda AZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1999 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 1999 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda AZ | 2012 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | AZ | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 2053 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4823 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2789 mm |
