1999 Mazda B2500 vs. 1975 Zastava 132
To start off, 1999 Mazda B2500 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Zastava 132 (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 645 kg more than 1975 Zastava 132.
Because 1999 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda B2500 (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda B2500 | 1975 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | B2500 | 132 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2560 mm |