1999 Mazda B2500 vs. 2001 Seat Inca Kombi

To start off, 2001 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda B2500 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 should accelerate faster than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 705 kg more than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda B2500 (266 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi.

Compare all specifications: