1999 Mazda B2500 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B2500. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Because 1999 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda B2500 (266 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda B2500 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | B2500 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 266 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2700 mm |
