1999 Mazda B3000 vs. 1992 Ford Tempo

To start off, 1999 Mazda B3000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B3000. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 31 kg more than 1999 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B3000. (198 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B3000. 1992 Ford Tempo has automatic transmission and 1999 Mazda B3000 has manual transmission. 1999 Mazda B3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ford Tempo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: