1999 Mazda B3000 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B3000. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 94 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda B3000 (198 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (148 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda B3000 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | B3000 | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 148 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |