1999 Mazda B3000 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda B3000 (105 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2009 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B3000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda B3000 (198 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda B3000 | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | B3000 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 121 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 33 L |