1999 Mazda B3000 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B3000. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B3000.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (360 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B3000. (198 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda B3000 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | B3000 | 3 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |