1999 Mazda B3000 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B3000. (105 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 593 kg more than 1999 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B3000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (409 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B3000. (198 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B3000. 2012 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1999 Mazda B3000 has manual transmission. 1999 Mazda B3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda B3000 | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | B3000 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 409 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4955 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |