1999 Mazda Demio vs. 2003 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2003 Samsung SM3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda Demio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda Demio would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Samsung SM3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Demio (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2003 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Demio should accelerate faster than 2003 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1999 Mazda Demio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Samsung SM3 (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Demio. (130 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Samsung SM3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Demio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda Demio | 2003 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Samsung |
| Model | Demio | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2540 mm |
