1999 Mazda Midge vs. 2010 Renault Logan
To start off, 2010 Renault Logan is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Logan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 67 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Logan weights approximately 314 kg more than 1999 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Logan (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Logan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda Midge | 2010 Renault Logan | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Midge | Logan |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |