1999 Mazda Midge vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 159 kg more than 1999 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda Midge | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Midge | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |