1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. 2008 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa (153 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
Because 1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (162 Nm). This means 2008 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda MX-5 Miata | 2008 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
Model | MX-5 Miata | Tocsa |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |