1999 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,610 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (163 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda RX-01 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-01 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2610 cc | 2485 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2630 mm |