1999 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (391 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda RX-01 | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
| Model | RX-01 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2610 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 391 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3040 mm |
