1999 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda RX-01 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | RX-01 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2610 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2880 mm |
