1999 Mazda RX-Evolv vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Plymouth Prowler weights approximately 70 kg more than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Prowler (610 Nm) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | RX-Evolv | Prowler |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 3507 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 610 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1300 mm |
