1999 Mazda RX-Evolv vs. 2003 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2003 Ford Falcon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2003 Ford Falcon. (220 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Falcon weights approximately 265 kg more than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | 2003 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | RX-Evolv | Falcon |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 8000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |