1999 Mazda RX-Evolv vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Mazda CX-7. (244 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda CX-7.
Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | RX-Evolv | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2298 cc |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 8000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
