1999 Mazda RX-Evolv vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | RX-Evolv | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 8000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1720 mm |
