1999 Mazda RX-Evolv vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-Evolv | Epica |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
