1999 MCC Smart vs. 1961 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 748 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 ZAZ Jalta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 MCC Smart (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1961 ZAZ Jalta. (23 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1961 ZAZ Jalta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 MCC Smart weights approximately 100 kg more than 1961 ZAZ Jalta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 MCC Smart (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 ZAZ Jalta. (45 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1999 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
1999 MCC Smart | 1961 ZAZ Jalta | |
Make | MCC | ZAZ |
Model | Smart | Jalta |
Year Released | 1999 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 23 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 45 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 3340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2030 mm |