1999 MCC Smart vs. 1962 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Toyota Crown (80 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Toyota Crown weights approximately 555 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Toyota Crown (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1962 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1999 MCC Smart | 1962 Toyota Crown | |
Make | MCC | Toyota |
Model | Smart | Crown |
Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 80 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 63.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 22.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2700 mm |