1999 MCC Smart vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1999 MCC Smart | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | MCC | Triumph |
Model | Smart | 2000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 799 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 64 L |