1999 MCC Smart vs. 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600

To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 416 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart. 1999 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 has manual transmission. 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1999 MCC Smart 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600
Make MCC Alfa Romeo
Model Smart 2600
Year Released 1999 1968
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 599 cc 2584 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 53 HP 163 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5900 RPM
Torque 80 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 63.5 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 63 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 700 kg 1116 kg
Vehicle Length 3230 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2280 mm 2510 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]